Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1990 (9) TMI 307

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... comes within the description of goods referred to in the said item of the Schedule II goods? (2) Whether, in the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was correct in law in interpreting that 'process camera' does not fall under the description of goods specified in item 6 of Schedule II to the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941?" 2.. Reference at the instance of the Revenue, is directed against the order of the Tribunal dated 28th September, 1976, in Revision Case No. 830 of 1970-71. The revision was against an appellate order dated 20th April, 1970, modifying the order of assessment of the Commercial Tax Officer, Esplanade Charge, under section 11(1) of the BFST Act, 1941, relating to four quarters ending 30th September, ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... those specifically mentioned. [See Black's Law Dictionary, Fifth Edition, page 464]. Therefore, the reference virtually raises the question whether photo process cameras come within the class of photographic cameras. To be precise, the question is whether they belong to the same general class of commodity. Incidentally, it may be mentioned here that if the contention of the Revenue is to be accepted, then the expression "other cameras" should have included cinematographic equipment including cameras as enumerated in item 5 of the Schedule. It would have been clearly unnecessary to specifically enumerate cinematographic camera, for according to the Revenue it might well have been comprehended within the category of other cameras as enumerat....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ed to in that case are not applicable in the case of a photo process camera where the mechanism for the purpose of processing is the same as in the case of photographic camera. Mr. De also argued that even though a photo process camera is not ordinarily used for the purpose for which a photographic camera is used, yet they cannot be held to be different merely from the point of view of the test of user. It may be mentioned here that photo process camera is used for the purpose of copying flat objects but it cannot be used to taking photographs of three dimensional objects. In support of the contention that the user test is not of much moment, reliance was placed in the case of Dongare v. State of Karnataka reported in [1990] 77 STC 462 (Kar....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... II, published by the Focal Press, London and New York, 1974 Edition. It is said at page 1181 of the book that the printing blocks used in the photo mechanical reproduction process are made from negatives which are exposed in a process camera-sometimes called a copying camera. The process camera is a permanent piece of equipment which is bolted down to the floor of the room or carried on runners which are bolted to the floor. The camera consists essentially of two vertical frames mounted on a set of horizontal rails. One frame carries the lens panel and the other the plate holder and the process screen. The photo process camera can be used for taking flat objects but cannot be used for taking photographs of three dimensional objects. It is ....