<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (9) TMI 307 - WEST BENGAL TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156331</link>
    <description>Item 6 of Schedule II to the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941 covers photographic and other cameras, but the expression &quot;other cameras&quot; is confined by ejusdem generis to articles of the same class as photographic cameras. A process camera, used for copying flat objects and printing purposes, is technologically distinct, not portable like a photographic camera, and cannot reproduce three-dimensional objects in the same way. The mere presence of the word &quot;camera&quot; is insufficient where the function, nature and commercial identity of the article differ materially. On that reasoning, a process camera was held not to fall within item 6 and not taxable under that entry.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2013 15:26:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=173358" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (9) TMI 307 - WEST BENGAL TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156331</link>
      <description>Item 6 of Schedule II to the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941 covers photographic and other cameras, but the expression &quot;other cameras&quot; is confined by ejusdem generis to articles of the same class as photographic cameras. A process camera, used for copying flat objects and printing purposes, is technologically distinct, not portable like a photographic camera, and cannot reproduce three-dimensional objects in the same way. The mere presence of the word &quot;camera&quot; is insufficient where the function, nature and commercial identity of the article differ materially. On that reasoning, a process camera was held not to fall within item 6 and not taxable under that entry.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156331</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>