Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2009 (12) TMI 790

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ober 1996. 2. The respondents were engaged in manufacture of wood and articles of woods, falling under Chapter 44 of the schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. Pursuant to the order passed by the Hon'ble Allahabad High Court in writ-petition No. 27 of 1995 regarding amalgamation of M/s. Dinex Plywood (P) Ltd., Sitapur with the respondent-company, a declaration came to be filed on 1st April 1996 by the respondents opting to pay full rate of excise duty in relation to the unit at Sitapur while at the same time opting to avail exemption benefit under Notification No. 1/93-C.E., dated 28th February 1993 as amended in relation to the unit at Dehradun. Referring to the amendment to the said notification and alleging illegal availment of exemption benefit under the said notification in relation to only one unit and resultant contravention of the provision of Rule 9(1), 173F & 173G of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, a show cause notice dated 30th October 1996 came to be issued to the respondents. The same was contested by the respondents, however, the Adjudicating Authority rejected the contentions sought to be raised on behalf of the respondents and confirmed the demand of Rs....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 335 (Tri. - Del.), CCE, Ludhiana v. Munjal Gases reported in 2003 (156) E.L.T. 1006 (Tri. - Del.) and Ceear Electronics v. CCE, Delhi-I reported in 2005 (187) E.L.T. 229 (Tri. - Del.) submitted that the point, which is sought to be raised in the matter, is fully covered by the said decisions and the same is answered in favour of the assessee. He further submitted that there is no bar for a manufacturer to opt for the benefit under the notification in relation to the one unit while not to avail such benefit in relation to the goods manufactured from another unit of the same manufacturer. There is no condition prescribed under the said notification imposing bar for such option. 6. The Notification 1/93-C.E. reads thus : Exemption to first clearances of specified goods upto the value of Rs. 30 lakhs and concessional duty thereafter in case of S.S.I. units having clearances not exceeding Rs. two crores in preceding year In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 5A of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 (1 of 1944) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act), the Central Government, being satisfied that it is necessary in the public interest so to do,....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....vant notification issued under sub-rule (1) of rule 8 of the said Rules or sub-section (1) of section 5A of the said Act, and in force for the time being], as is equivalent to an amount calculated at the rate of 5 per cent ad valorem : Provided that the amount of duty of excise payable on the specified goods under item (i) of sub-clause (a), or sub-clause (b), or sub-clause (c), shall not be less than an amount calculated at the rate of 5 per cent ad valorem : Provided further that the aggregate value of clearances of the specified goods in terms of sub-clauses (a), (b) and (c) taken together, shall not exceed rupees seventy five lakhs. (2) a factory, other than a factory, - (a)   which is specified in clause (1) of this paragraph, or (b)  which is registered with Directorate General of Technical Development under the provisions of the Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951 (65 of 1951), - in the case of first clearances of the specified goods upto an aggregate value not exceeding rupees ten lakhs from whole of the duty of excise leviable thereon. 2. The aggregate value of clearances of the specified goods for home consumption in a fin....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....cise leviable thereon by any other notification (not being a notification where exemption from the whole of duty of excise leviable thereon is granted based upon the value or quantity of clearances made in a financial year) issued under sub-rule (1) of Rule 8 of the said Rules or sub-section (1) of Section 5A of the said Act, shall not be taken into account. Explanation III. - For the purpose of computing the aggregate value of clearances under paragraph 1, 2 or 3, the clearances of any excisable goods where a manufacturer affixes the specified goods with a brand name or a trade name (registered or not) of another person who is not eligible for the grant of exemption under this notification, shall not be taken into account. Explanation IV. - For the purposes of determining the value of clearances under this notification, in respect of Chinaware or Porcelainware or both, where a manufacturer gets such Chinaware or Porcelainware or both fired in a kiln belonging to or maintained by a Pottery Development Centre run by the Central Government or a State Government or by the Khadi and Village Industries Commission, the value of the Chinaware or Porcelainware or both, belonging to t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....le-rickshaw" means a mechanically propelled cycle or, as the case may be, mechanically propelled cycle-rickshaw, which may also be pedalled, if any necessity arises for so doing. ANNEXURE (1) All goods falling under Heading No. 56.02, 73.07, 73.08, 73.09, (1) 73.10, 73.11, 73.12, 73.13, 73.14, 73.15, 73.16, 73.17, 73.18, 73.19, 73.20, 73.21, 73.22, 73.23, 73.24, 73.26, 74.08, 74.12, 74.13, 74.14, 74.15, 74.16, 74.17, 74.18, or 74.19 of the said Schedule. (2) All goods falling under sub-heading No. 0901.20, 0901.90, (2) 0902.11, 0902.12, 0903.10, 5102.90, 5105.00, 5108.00, 5301.10, 5303.10, 5304.00, 5308.00, 5601.00, 5603.00, 5604.00, 5605.90, 5607.90, 5608.00, 5903,11, 5903.21, 5903.91, 5904.20, 5907.00, 5909.00, 6202.00, 6301.00, 7216.50, 7301.20, or 7302.90 of the said Schedule. (3) Rubber solution or vulcanizing solution; powered cycles and (3) powered cycle-rickshaws; side cars of motor cycles (including scooters); evaporative type of coolers and parts of such coolers and flat rolled products of iron or steel clad. (4) All other goods specified in the said Schedule other than the (4) following namely :- (i) all goods falling under Chapter 9, 24, 51, 52, 53, 54....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he notification and obviously subject to the conditions specified thereunder. Clause (ii) thereof refers to the aggregate value of clearances of the specified goods in a financial year. Clause (iii) specifies that nothing contained in the notification shall apply if the aggregate value of the clearances of all excisable goods for home consumption by a manufacturer from one or more factories or from any factory by one or more manufacturers exceeds Rs. 200 lakhs in the preceding financial year. The amendment by virtue of Notification No. 59 of 1994 clears that the manufacturer having opted for not availing the benefit of exemption and subjected himself to pay the duty at the rates specified under the Act would be liable to pay such duty in relation to all the subsequent clearances of the specified goods made after availing such option in a financial year. 9. Though it was strenuously argued on behalf of the appellants that Clause (ii) and (iii) to the Notification would clearly disclose that the option cannot be restricted to only one of the units owned by a manufacturer, Clause (iii) rather than lending any support to such contention, the same persuades us to take the view contra....