Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, under Notification No. 1/93-C.E. as amended by Notification No. 59/94-C.E., a manufacturer having more than one factory could opt to avail the small scale exemption in respect of one unit while not availing it for another unit of the same manufacturer.
Analysis: The notification granted exemption on clearances of specified goods subject to value limits and other conditions, and the amendment permitted a manufacturer to opt out of the exemption and pay duty at the applicable rate for a financial year. The decisive distinction lay between provisions governing eligibility based on aggregate clearances from one or more factories, and the provision dealing with the manufacturer's option to forgo exemption. The aggregate-clearance clauses were relevant for determining overall eligibility, but they did not compel uniform treatment of all units for the purpose of exercising the exemption option. The absence of language requiring a manufacturer with multiple units to exercise the option identically for every unit indicated that the choice could be made unit-wise. This interpretation was consistent with earlier Tribunal decisions holding that exemption under the notification could be availed for one unit without being availed for another.
Conclusion: The manufacturer was entitled to avail the exemption for one unit while not availing it for another unit, and the demand based on the contrary view was unsustainable.
Ratio Decidendi: In the absence of an express prohibition, an SSI exemption notification permitting a manufacturer to opt out of exemption does not require the option to be exercised uniformly across all units owned by that manufacturer.