2009 (12) TMI 787

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... The said order confirms a duty demand of Rs. 48,74,828/- and imposes penalties of Rs. 48,74,828/- and Rs. 1 lakh against the first applicants and imposes penalty of Rs. 50,000/- on the second applicants. The de novo order has been passed by the Joint Commissioner in pursuance of order of remand passed by the Tribunal earlier read with Miscellaneous Order dated 30-9-2008. It is the grievance of the applicants that the said order of remand and miscellaneous order have not been complied with and the necessary documents have not been furnished. 3. We note at the outset that while disposing of the earlier applications of the applicants, the Tribunal had prescribed a time limit of three months for the adjudicating authority to pass fresh ord....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rders-in-Original Nos. 03 and 04/JC/CE/2009, dated 17-2-2009. The parties did not appear for the numerous personal hearings given by various adjudicating officers and the Orders-in-Original were passed ex parte and subsequently appeals filed with Commissioner (Appeals) were rejected. Thereafter, the parties filed a petition with CESTAT and the Hon'ble Tribunal directed to furnish copies of documents again vide its Order dated 3-10-2008. (ii)   On receipt of the above order, the parties were once again provided with copies of documents for the second time wherein 5099 pages and 590 sheets of documents were again given on 11-12-2008 which were acknowledged by all the parties concerned along with their consultant Shri T. Subbiah N....