<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (12) TMI 787 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153864</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed two applications filed directly against a de novo adjudication order, emphasizing the need to follow the statutory appeal process. The applicants&#039; claims of non-compliance and non-supply of documents were refuted by the department, stating that substantial document copies were provided. The Tribunal clarified that its decisions were based solely on the documents supplied, with those not provided not influencing the outcome. It was ruled that the applicants should address their grievances through the first appellate authority rather than filing applications directly with the Tribunal, leading to the dismissal of both applications.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2013 11:44:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=170898" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (12) TMI 787 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153864</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed two applications filed directly against a de novo adjudication order, emphasizing the need to follow the statutory appeal process. The applicants&#039; claims of non-compliance and non-supply of documents were refuted by the department, stating that substantial document copies were provided. The Tribunal clarified that its decisions were based solely on the documents supplied, with those not provided not influencing the outcome. It was ruled that the applicants should address their grievances through the first appellate authority rather than filing applications directly with the Tribunal, leading to the dismissal of both applications.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153864</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>