2009 (8) TMI 1030

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....upal, JDR, for the Respondent. ORDER We have heard both sides on the appeal against the order of the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals) upholding demand of Rs. 64,800/- confirmed against the assessees therein by denying the benefit of Notification No. 1/95-C.E., dated 4-1-1995, for the reason that the consignment of Sodium Hydro Sulphite cleared on the strength of CT-3 certificated dat....