Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled to retain the benefit of Notification No. 1/95-C.E. when goods cleared without payment of duty for supply to a 100% export oriented unit were destroyed in transit and the rewarehousing certificate was not received within the prescribed period.
Analysis: The notification placed responsibility on the manufacturer to pay duty if the rewarehousing certificate was not received within 90 days from the date of removal. The goods in question never reached the 100% export oriented unit, and therefore the condition for exemption was not fulfilled. On that basis, no legal infirmity was found in the demand confirmed by the lower authority.
Conclusion: The assessee was not entitled to the exemption benefit, and the duty demand was sustained.
Final Conclusion: The appeal failed and the demand confirmed by the lower authority remained in force.
Ratio Decidendi: Where goods cleared without payment of duty for supply to a 100% export oriented unit do not reach the destination and the rewarehousing certificate is not received within the stipulated time, the exemption under the notification is not available and duty becomes payable.