1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Appellate Tribunal Upholds Denial of Excise Benefit for Destroyed Goods /95CE .O.URequirement</h1> The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT CHENNAI upheld the Commissioner of Central Excise's order denying the benefit of Notification No. 1/95-C.E. to the assessees ... - The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT CHENNAI upheld the order of the Commissioner of Central Excise denying the benefit of Notification No. 1/95-C.E. to the assessees due to goods destroyed in transit without being put to use, leading to a demand of Rs. 64,800. The appeal was dismissed as the goods did not reach the 100% E.O.U as required by the notification.