2010 (1) TMI 1039

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r the Respondent. ORDER The Department is in appeal against the impugned order whereby the Commissioner held that forfeiture of their deposit of Rs. 5,000/- made by the CHA firm and the period for extension are sufficient as punishment for irregularity committed by them for not obtaining the authorisation from the exporter in respect of consignment. 2. The Department is in appeal on the g....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....er, which shows that the CHA vas not at all involved. Further, he also submitted that explanation given by the CHA that he had signed the documents because there was a Bandh declared next day and also that his employee had checked up the actual contents of the consignments have been accepted by the Commissioner. There is no evidence to show that this order has been challenged. 6. In addition, w....