https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153649 The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner's decision regarding the Customs House Agent (CHA) firm's irregularities, including the forfeiture of deposit and extension period as sufficient punishment for not obtaining authorization from the exporter. The Tribunal accepted the CHA's explanations for certain irregularities and found no involvement in a drug seizure case. As the only proven omission was the failure to obtain authorization, the Tribunal rejected the Revenue's appeal, affirming the Commissioner's decision and the imposed punishment for the CHA's actions. en-us Wed, 20 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 26 Jul 2013 12:42:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153649 The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner's decision regarding the Customs House Agent (CHA) firm's irregularities, including the forfeiture of deposit and extension period as sufficient punishment for not obtaining authorization from the exporter. The Tribunal accepted the CHA's explanations for certain irregularities and found no involvement in a drug seizure case. As the only proven omission was the failure to obtain authorization, the Tribunal rejected the Revenue's appeal, affirming the Commissioner's decision and the imposed punishment for the CHA's actions. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 20 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153649