2009 (11) TMI 719
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....rmation Commission held the hearing on 26-8-2009. On perusal of the documents filed before the CIC and hearing both the parties, CIC decided vide order dated 22-9-2009 that any question regarding disclosure of vigilance related files in various categories should be taken only after consulting the Central Vigilance Commission as the CVOs of Public Authorities are directly controlled by the CVC and ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....he authorities concerned to take appropriate decision in this regard. However, she apprehends that the applicant is seeking information/inspection of documents, records, files etc. with the vexatious, frivolous and malicious motive to harass and defame her. She requested that, if the appellate authority decides to permit the applicant inspection/disclosure, the same may be allowed on a condition t....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....rovisions contained in Section 10 of the RTI Act, 2005 if applicable. The CPIO is directed to take appropriate action in this regard. 5. Regarding the request of Ms. Jyoti Balasundaram to obtain undertaking from the appellant to the effect that the information would not be used by him to defame her in any manner, it is observed that that there is no provision in the RTI Act to impose any such con....