<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (11) TMI 719 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152548</link>
    <description>The Central Information Commission (CIC) directed consultation with the Central Vigilance Commission (CVC) for disclosure of vigilance related files in response to an RTI application. After consulting with the CVC and a concerned third party, Ms. Jyoti Balasundaram, specific documents were allowed for inspection by the appellant, subject to RTI Act provisions. Despite Ms. Balasundaram&#039;s concerns about potential misuse of information, no conditions against defamation could be imposed under the RTI Act. As the appellant was granted access to relevant files, a hearing was deemed unnecessary, and the appeal was disposed of in accordance with RTI Act provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Jul 2013 14:33:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=169585" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (11) TMI 719 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152548</link>
      <description>The Central Information Commission (CIC) directed consultation with the Central Vigilance Commission (CVC) for disclosure of vigilance related files in response to an RTI application. After consulting with the CVC and a concerned third party, Ms. Jyoti Balasundaram, specific documents were allowed for inspection by the appellant, subject to RTI Act provisions. Despite Ms. Balasundaram&#039;s concerns about potential misuse of information, no conditions against defamation could be imposed under the RTI Act. As the appellant was granted access to relevant files, a hearing was deemed unnecessary, and the appeal was disposed of in accordance with RTI Act provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152548</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>