2006 (4) TMI 461

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....one, for the Respondent. ORDER Facts : Appellant Dr. Anand Akhila, scientist residing in Lucknow applied to PIO DS Bedi on October 26, 2005 asking for inspection of records related to his assessment promotion. To this he received a reply on December 5, 2005 stating that the request could not be allowed as it was exempted u/s 8(1) of the Act. Possibly realising that such a response was in vio....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....formed of the date of hearing, there is no representative of CSIR present. Nor has that public authority sent any comments in response to the Commission's orders of March 30, 2006 asking for comments by 19-4-2006. The appellant seeks : (1) Information on marks awarded to him by each committee member, without disclosing their names (2) The threshold mark fixed by the board for promotion (3....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....on sought by the appellant be provided to him within fifteen days from the issue of this decision. (2) The PIO Dr DS Bedi seems to have had no reasonable ground for delay in sending the brief and slipshod response to the application of the appellant. The complaint of mala fide intent has not been denied. He will thus show cause within ten working days u/s 20(1) of the Act as to why he should no....