https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151865 The Central Information Commission found that the denial of information requested by the appellant, a scientist, under Section 8(1) of the Act was unjustified. The Commission ordered the public authority to provide the requested information within fifteen days. Additionally, the public authority's failure to respond to the appeal and provide written comments was noted, indicating a disregard for the appeal process and the law. The Commission directed the PIO to show cause for the delay in responding to the request and recommended disciplinary action against the Appellate Authority for failing to act in the public interest. en-us Mon, 24 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 18 Jun 2013 14:37:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151865 The Central Information Commission found that the denial of information requested by the appellant, a scientist, under Section 8(1) of the Act was unjustified. The Commission ordered the public authority to provide the requested information within fifteen days. Additionally, the public authority's failure to respond to the appeal and provide written comments was noted, indicating a disregard for the appeal process and the law. The Commission directed the PIO to show cause for the delay in responding to the request and recommended disciplinary action against the Appellate Authority for failing to act in the public interest. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 24 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151865