2008 (12) TMI 647
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....t. Shri Samir Chitkara, SDR, for the Respondent. ORDER Vide stay order No. S/ 667/WZB/AHD/2008 dated 30-7-2008 [2009 (13) S.T.R. 429 (Tri. - Ahmd.)], the appellants were directed to deposit an amount of Rs. 60 lakhs out of total duty amount of Rs. 2.06 crores and penalty of Rs. 4.13 crores. The said direction was made after appreciating the appellant's contention on merits and it was obse....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ight weeks. 3. On matter being called today for ascertaining the compliance, the learned Advocate draws our attention to another modification filed by him and argues that in view of the subsequent decision of the Tribunal, the direction to deposit the balance amount needs to be modified. Specific reliance stand placed on the Tribunal's decision in the case of Reliance Industries Ltd. v. CCE, Ra....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....iance Industries, it was admissible in respect of the transport allowance being reimbursable expenses and it would not be applicable to the fact of the present case. As such, the learned SDR prays for rejection of the modification application and consequent dismissal of appeal as the said order does not stand complied with by the appellants. 5. After appreciating the submissions made by both th....
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
TaxTMI