https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128546 The Tribunal upheld the initial order directing the appellants to deposit Rs. 60 lakhs for hearing their appeal based on financial status and lack of prima facie case. A modification application seeking a change in deposit amount was dismissed as no new grounds were presented, and the deposit period was extended by eight weeks. The Tribunal rejected the modification application, citing lack of justifiable reasons, but extended the deposit period by four weeks due to partial compliance. Compliance review was scheduled for 6-1-2009. en-us Thu, 04 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 08 Apr 2013 10:30:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128546 The Tribunal upheld the initial order directing the appellants to deposit Rs. 60 lakhs for hearing their appeal based on financial status and lack of prima facie case. A modification application seeking a change in deposit amount was dismissed as no new grounds were presented, and the deposit period was extended by eight weeks. The Tribunal rejected the modification application, citing lack of justifiable reasons, but extended the deposit period by four weeks due to partial compliance. Compliance review was scheduled for 6-1-2009. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 04 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128546