2009 (8) TMI 898

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....orty, JDR, for the Respondent. ORDER Appellants filed these Appeals against the impugned order whereby penalty of Rs. 1,50,000/- (Rupees One Lakh Fifty Thousand only) each was imposed on M/s. N.F. Forgings (P) Ltd., manufacturer and M/s. Uma Forging Works (P) Ltd., job-worker under Rule 27 of Central Excise Rules, 2002. Another penalty of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) was impose....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... appellants are not liable to any penalty. 3. It is also submitted that in the show cause notice there was no proposal to impose penalty under Rule 27 of Central Excise Rules hence the impugned order is not sustainable. 4. The contention of Revenue is that during verification of the record certain irregularities were found as the description of vehicles given in the transport documents was f....