<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (8) TMI 898 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128106</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT KOLKATA overturned penalties imposed on two companies and a director under Rule 27 of the Central Excise Rules. The penalties, totaling Rs. 1,50,000 each on the companies and Rs. 20,000 on the director, were deemed unsustainable as they exceeded the prescribed limit of Rs. 5,000 under Rule 27. Despite discrepancies in transport documents, since no duty demand was confirmed and export benefits were granted, the Tribunal held that the penalties were not justified and set them aside, allowing the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 17:08:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=164977" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (8) TMI 898 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128106</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT KOLKATA overturned penalties imposed on two companies and a director under Rule 27 of the Central Excise Rules. The penalties, totaling Rs. 1,50,000 each on the companies and Rs. 20,000 on the director, were deemed unsustainable as they exceeded the prescribed limit of Rs. 5,000 under Rule 27. Despite discrepancies in transport documents, since no duty demand was confirmed and export benefits were granted, the Tribunal held that the penalties were not justified and set them aside, allowing the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=128106</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>