Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2009 (3) TMI 774

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ellant. Shri S.R. Prasad, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : Archana Wadhwa, Member (J)]. - After hearing both the sides, we find that the Additional Commissioner has confirmed an amount of Rs. 16,65,172/- against the appellant by denying them to Cenvat credit in respect of service tax paid by them on the services received on Cement and Clinker unit. The said denial was made on the gro....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... 2. Apart from the above, we find that Original Adjudicating Authority disallowed the credit of Rs. 5,66,671/- on the ground that service tax provider has paid excess duty than what was required to be paid by him. There is no denial of the fact that the appellants have availed credit on service tax paid by the provider. The assessment at the provider's end has not been re-opened or changed. ....