<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (3) TMI 774 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126097</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Ahmedabad addressed the denial of Cenvat credit amounting to Rs. 16,65,172 on services received for the Cement and Clinker unit. The Tribunal allowed credit for services related to the final product Clinker, proportionately for mixed services, and disallowed credit where no relationship with input services existed. Additionally, the Tribunal examined the disallowance of credit of Rs. 5,66,671 due to excess duty paid by the service tax provider, ruling in favor of the appellants as the credit availed was lawful. Consequently, the Tribunal granted the stay petition in favor of the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 12:07:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=162999" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (3) TMI 774 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126097</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Ahmedabad addressed the denial of Cenvat credit amounting to Rs. 16,65,172 on services received for the Cement and Clinker unit. The Tribunal allowed credit for services related to the final product Clinker, proportionately for mixed services, and disallowed credit where no relationship with input services existed. Additionally, the Tribunal examined the disallowance of credit of Rs. 5,66,671 due to excess duty paid by the service tax provider, ruling in favor of the appellants as the credit availed was lawful. Consequently, the Tribunal granted the stay petition in favor of the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126097</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>