Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2009 (3) TMI 767

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ant. None, for the Respondent. [Order per : Ashok Jindal, Member (J)]. - Heard the ld. SDR and perused the records. None appeared on behalf of the respondents in spite of notice. 2. The short point involved in the instant appeal filed by the Revenue is, whether the goods valued at Rs. 41.67 lakhs seized from the premises of M/s. Suresh Enterprises are liable to confiscation or not....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ails clearly reflect that the said goods manufactured were scented tobacco and were in a ready-to-despatch condition. In view of such explicit clarity in the annexure of the said Panchanama, the Commissioner ought to have given due weightage to these details and resultantly ordered the confiscation of the said seized material. To this extent, the Commissioner has clearly erred in his findings and ....