<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (3) TMI 767 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126090</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal through remand, directing the Commissioner to reconsider the confiscation of goods valued at Rs. 41.67 lakhs seized from the premises based on the clear details available in the records. The Commissioner&#039;s order was modified to ensure proper consideration of the facts and circumstances before deciding on the confiscation and redemption fine, emphasizing the importance of a comprehensive review of the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 11:39:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=162993" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (3) TMI 767 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126090</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal through remand, directing the Commissioner to reconsider the confiscation of goods valued at Rs. 41.67 lakhs seized from the premises based on the clear details available in the records. The Commissioner&#039;s order was modified to ensure proper consideration of the facts and circumstances before deciding on the confiscation and redemption fine, emphasizing the importance of a comprehensive review of the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126090</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>