Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2008 (9) TMI 742

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e, for the Appellant. Shri S.R. Prasad, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : Archana Wadhwa, Member (J)]. - The duty of Rs. 3,86,18,635/- stands confirmed against the appellant along with imposition of penalty of identical amount. 2. The dispute in the present appeal relates to the correct classification of "Aluminium Casseroles". Whereas the appellant have claimed the classifica....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... with an identical issue. It stands observed in the said decision that merely because containers are not durable, it cannot be held that they do not fall under 76.15 and cannot be considered as table, kitchen or other household articles. It further stands observed that there is no requirement of durability mentioned in the said tariff heading. By discussing the chapter and the other relevant mater....