<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (9) TMI 742 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124949</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Ahmedabad, ruled in favor of the appellant regarding the correct classification of &quot;Aluminium Casseroles&quot; under the Central Excise Tariff. The Tribunal accepted the appellant&#039;s arguments based on legal provisions and precedents, classifying the casseroles under Tariff Heading 7615.19. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the stay petition, scheduled an expedited appeal hearing, and favored the appellant in the dispute, overturning the initial duty assessment and penalty imposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 14:01:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=161883" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (9) TMI 742 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124949</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Ahmedabad, ruled in favor of the appellant regarding the correct classification of &quot;Aluminium Casseroles&quot; under the Central Excise Tariff. The Tribunal accepted the appellant&#039;s arguments based on legal provisions and precedents, classifying the casseroles under Tariff Heading 7615.19. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the stay petition, scheduled an expedited appeal hearing, and favored the appellant in the dispute, overturning the initial duty assessment and penalty imposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124949</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>