2008 (9) TMI 662

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rder No. 677/2008 dated 30-5-2008 2. Shri Ranganathan, the learned Advocate appeared on behalf of the appellants and Smt. Sudha Koka, the learned SDR, for the Revenue. 3. We heard both sides. 4. In respect of the Stay Order passed by this Bench, the following submissions are made : "2. In the earlier order No. 976/2006 (Annexure I) dated 21-9-2006 regarding full waiver of the pre-deposit, there has been a mistake as hereunder, "The Certificate has been attested by the Principal Secretary to the Government of India Dept. of energy". 1. At page 26 of the Paper Book in appeal E/579/2006, it could be seen that the attestation of the Certificate has been done by Notary, Bhuvaneswar Govt. of Orissa (Indi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he project Authority have to sign the Certificate supplier-wise/goods-wise. 8. Therefore the practice is only to issue one consolidated certificate, covering all suppliers and their goods and issue a photocopy of the attested certificate to each supplier. At page 26 of the Appeal paper Book it could be seen in the Certificate, that other suppliers have been also included, besides the petitioner (Annexure III). 9. The petitioner shall produce evidence in respect of the above practice during the hearing of this petition. As a matter of fact such an evidence is already there, with this Appellate Tribunal, when the petitioner produced the earlier certificates as directed during the hearing of the appeal. 10. In the SCN a....