https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124451 A certificate issued under Notification No. 108/95 satisfied the prescribed condition where the project certificate scheme contemplated a consolidated certificate for multiple sub-vendors and individual recipients received copies rather than the original. The earlier final order rested on an incorrect assumption that the certificate had been attested by the Principal Secretary, when it had only been countersigned and later notarised. In those circumstances, insisting on production of the original would have imposed an impracticable requirement and defeated the notification's intended benefit. The earlier order was therefore recalled and relief granted under the notification. en-us Tue, 23 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 29 Sep 2012 15:03:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124451 A certificate issued under Notification No. 108/95 satisfied the prescribed condition where the project certificate scheme contemplated a consolidated certificate for multiple sub-vendors and individual recipients received copies rather than the original. The earlier final order rested on an incorrect assumption that the certificate had been attested by the Principal Secretary, when it had only been countersigned and later notarised. In those circumstances, insisting on production of the original would have imposed an impracticable requirement and defeated the notification's intended benefit. The earlier order was therefore recalled and relief granted under the notification. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 23 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124451