2007 (5) TMI 544

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....is an appeal against the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) No. 299 to 300/2002/Commr(A)/Raj dt. 10-2-2006 in so far as the same related to the present respondent. 2. Heard the ld. DR for the Department. None appears for the appellant in spite of notice. Perused the records. 3. In this case, it is noticed that certain goods were seized from the appellant's possession, who is a transpo....