<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (5) TMI 544 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124061</link>
    <description>Goods transported on fictitious invoices and a transporter habitually booking consignments in the names of fictitious consignors were treated as sufficient to infer knowledge and justify confiscation of the goods and vehicle. The repeated similar incidents supported the finding that confiscation was warranted on the facts. However, the overall circumstances justified interference with the penalty component, and the redemption fine was reduced from Rs. 30,000 to Rs. 20,000.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 11:12:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=161018" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (5) TMI 544 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124061</link>
      <description>Goods transported on fictitious invoices and a transporter habitually booking consignments in the names of fictitious consignors were treated as sufficient to infer knowledge and justify confiscation of the goods and vehicle. The repeated similar incidents supported the finding that confiscation was warranted on the facts. However, the overall circumstances justified interference with the penalty component, and the redemption fine was reduced from Rs. 30,000 to Rs. 20,000.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124061</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>