2007 (12) TMI 383

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he Appellant. Ms. Sudha Koka, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : S.L. Peeran, Member (J)]. -  By stay order Nos. 1075-1077/2006 dated 28-9-2006, the appellants were directed to pre-deposit an amount of Rs. 10,00,000/- and to report compliance on 10th January 2007. The same has been complied. In the meanwhile, the Revenue was directed not to proceed to recover the balance disputed ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....00,000/-. The same has been deposited. The Revenue ought not to have proceeded for recovery of the balance amount and such action of the Department is not appreciated. The Commissioner should instruct all officers not to proceed for recovery of the amount when the stay orders are in operation. There shall be no recovery of the balance amount till the disposal of the appeals. The Misc. application ....