https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123628 The Bench ruled in favor of the appellants, criticizing the Revenue for attempting to recover the balance amount during the stay order. It was decided that no recovery should take place until the appeals were disposed of. The stay order was extended, and the Commissioner was directed to ensure officers do not proceed with recovery during such stays. The case referenced a Supreme Court judgment to support the argument against recovery during the pendency of stay orders. en-us Wed, 19 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 18 Sep 2012 15:37:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123628 The Bench ruled in favor of the appellants, criticizing the Revenue for attempting to recover the balance amount during the stay order. It was decided that no recovery should take place until the appeals were disposed of. The stay order was extended, and the Commissioner was directed to ensure officers do not proceed with recovery during such stays. The case referenced a Supreme Court judgment to support the argument against recovery during the pendency of stay orders. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 19 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123628