Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2007 (3) TMI 620

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ri A. Hore, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order]. -  Heard both sides. 2. The Lower Appellate Authority has upheld the order of the original authority who has held as follows : "On careful analysis of the facts and circumstances of the case, I find that there is adequate physical/circumstantial evidence regarding attempted exports in an illicit manner. The relevant facts/consider....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....or release of seized sugar without any licit document/papers regarding acquisition/transportation/exportation of the goods. There is no cogent evidence on record regarding legal ownership of said goods by the claimant." 3. Heard Shri B.N. Chattopadhyaya, ld. Consultant appearing for the appellants. He states that the impugned sugar was being carried by the metal road away from the border, ....