https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122547 Confiscation for alleged illicit export of sugar could not be sustained because the evidentiary basis for export intention was insufficient. The record showed that the driver was carrying documents and that the claimant later produced ownership papers, but the impugned order did not properly consider those documents and proceeded on an unsupported assumption of movement without licit papers. As the material on record did not establish an attempted illegal export, the adverse findings and connected confiscation orders were set aside and relief was granted to the appellants. en-us Mon, 26 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 14 Aug 2012 15:35:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122547 Confiscation for alleged illicit export of sugar could not be sustained because the evidentiary basis for export intention was insufficient. The record showed that the driver was carrying documents and that the claimant later produced ownership papers, but the impugned order did not properly consider those documents and proceeded on an unsupported assumption of movement without licit papers. As the material on record did not establish an attempted illegal export, the adverse findings and connected confiscation orders were set aside and relief was granted to the appellants. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 26 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122547