Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2007 (6) TMI 428

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Shri Anil Kumar, JDR, for the Appellant. Smt. Rukmani Menon, Advocate, for the Respondent. [Order per : S.L. Peeran, Member (J) (Oral)]. - The misc. application has been filed by the Revenue seeking extension of time by three months to re-adjudicate the matter in terms of direction given by this Bench by Final Order No. 889/2001 dated 10-5-2001 in Appeal No. E/410/1998 [2001 (135) E.L.T.....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....l)]. The Commissioner ought to have come up much before the expiry of three months granted by the Tribunal in the Final Order for extension of time to re-adjudicate.  Even from the date of the above application, three months period has elapsed. This is a fit case, which should be referred to the Hon'ble Revenue Secretary and to the Chairman of the Board to take due notice of the matter and gi....