https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122413 The Tribunal expressed strong dissatisfaction with the Revenue Commissioner's delay in re-adjudicating a matter for over six years, involving a significant duty amount. The Tribunal involved higher authorities by referring the matter to the Revenue Secretary and the Chairman of the Board. A strict deadline of 45 days was set for the Commissioner to complete the re-adjudication, with a warning of serious consequences for non-compliance. Ultimately, the misc. application was allowed on the terms specified in the judgment, emphasizing the importance of timely compliance with Tribunal directions in cases of substantial duty amounts. en-us Tue, 26 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 10 Apr 2013 12:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122413 The Tribunal expressed strong dissatisfaction with the Revenue Commissioner's delay in re-adjudicating a matter for over six years, involving a significant duty amount. The Tribunal involved higher authorities by referring the matter to the Revenue Secretary and the Chairman of the Board. A strict deadline of 45 days was set for the Commissioner to complete the re-adjudication, with a warning of serious consequences for non-compliance. Ultimately, the misc. application was allowed on the terms specified in the judgment, emphasizing the importance of timely compliance with Tribunal directions in cases of substantial duty amounts. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 26 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122413