2007 (3) TMI 525

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Ms. Shilpa Balani, Advocate, for the Respondent. [Order]. - This is a miscellaneous application filed by the Department praying to delete the interest @ 9% per annum on the seized goods from the impugned Order dated 24-3-2006 passed by the Tribunal. 2. By impugned order dated 24-3-2006 the Tribunal has set aside the seizure of gold biscuits and ordered its release in favour of the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... would amount to review of the Order and as such it is not maintainable. According to the ld. Counsel for the respondents under Rule 41 of CESTAT Procedure Rules, the CESTAT has inherent powers to pass such orders which are necessary in the interest of justice She has placed reliance in the Tribunal's Judgment in the case of Mohammed Yaseen reported in 2005 (189) E.L.T. 56, wherein interest is awa....