https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121316 Interest on the sale proceeds of seized goods was challenged through a miscellaneous application limited to the interest component. The Tribunal found no error apparent on the face of the record, noted that the Department did not dispute the earlier order on merits, and treated the request as an impermissible review in substance. In the absence of any specific statutory prohibition, and relying on its power to pass orders necessary in the interest of justice, equity and established practice, the Tribunal sustained the direction awarding 9% interest and rejected the application. en-us Fri, 30 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 28 Jul 2012 12:47:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121316 Interest on the sale proceeds of seized goods was challenged through a miscellaneous application limited to the interest component. The Tribunal found no error apparent on the face of the record, noted that the Department did not dispute the earlier order on merits, and treated the request as an impermissible review in substance. In the absence of any specific statutory prohibition, and relying on its power to pass orders necessary in the interest of justice, equity and established practice, the Tribunal sustained the direction awarding 9% interest and rejected the application. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 30 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121316