2006 (7) TMI 506
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Appellant. [Order per : Archana Wadhwa, Member (J)]. - Appearing in support of the miscellaneous application for rectification of mistake in the Tribunal Order No. A/65-70/WZB/06/C-II/EB, dated 10-1-2006 [2006 (199) E.L.T. 241 (Tri.)], Shri Naresh Thacker, ld. Advocate submits that in though time was granted to the appellants to file the submissions by 30-11-2005, the same has not been file....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....dered and, as such, we are of the view that there is no mistake apparent on the face of the records, merely because the written arguments, which were, in any case, also advanced at the time of hearing and taken note of by the Bench, were not considered. 3. However, to be fair to the appellants, we have seen the written submission filed on 29-11-2005 and find that the issue raised therein h....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ion of the goods and if there is no production requirements of export cannot be foisted upon them and non fulfillment of export obligation cannot be alleged. We do not agree with the above contention of the Ld. Advocate, the expression "use" in the notification and production of "aquaculture products and export in out of India" have to be read in conjunction and as one expression. If the two terms....
TaxTMI