https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119919 The Tribunal rejected the appellant's request for rectification of a mistake in the Tribunal Order, as it was determined that the issues raised in the written submissions were already considered during the proceedings. The Tribunal emphasized that the obligation to export goods only arises after production for aquaculture purposes, and failing to meet this requirement cannot be excused by the absence of production. Granting benefits without fulfilling production obligations was deemed unjustifiable. Therefore, the Tribunal found no merit in the appellant's arguments and disposed of the application accordingly. en-us Fri, 28 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 14 Jul 2012 11:24:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119919 The Tribunal rejected the appellant's request for rectification of a mistake in the Tribunal Order, as it was determined that the issues raised in the written submissions were already considered during the proceedings. The Tribunal emphasized that the obligation to export goods only arises after production for aquaculture purposes, and failing to meet this requirement cannot be excused by the absence of production. Granting benefits without fulfilling production obligations was deemed unjustifiable. Therefore, the Tribunal found no merit in the appellant's arguments and disposed of the application accordingly. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 28 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119919