Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2006 (6) TMI 358

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Meena, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : P.G. Chacko, Member (J)]. -  The appellants were importing "Monosodium Glutamate"in bulk quantities and repacking the same and selling in the Indian market through distributors. Their product is known as "AJI-NO-MOTO"in the domestic market. During April, 2003 to July, 2004, they marketed the product with the above brand-name, without paymen....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Notification. Learned Consultant has also relied on the Tribunal's decision in SPM Instruments India (P) Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Hyderabad [2003 (152) E.L.T. 115 (Tri.-Bang.)]. We have heard learned SDR also, who has reiterated the findings contained in the impugned order. 2. After examining the records, our attention has been caught by Article 2 of the above agreement, wh....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....company) and that the appellants were only allowed to make limited use of the brand-name in India. The case law relied on by learned Consultant is apparently based on the finding of fact that the said party was entitled to use the brand-name in India to the exclusion of all others. It, therefore, does not seem to support the appellants' claim for the benefit of the above Notification. The assessee....