https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119735 Use of another person's brand name defeated the claim to SSI exemption because the agreement showed the trademark remained the sole and exclusive property of the foreign licensor, while the appellant received only a limited, non-exclusive and non-transferable licence in India. On that basis, the Tribunal found no strong prima facie case for complete waiver of pre-deposit in respect of the duty demand. It nevertheless adopted a lenient interim approach and granted only partial relief by directing a pre-deposit, rather than full waiver. en-us Mon, 05 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 12 Jul 2012 17:58:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119735 Use of another person's brand name defeated the claim to SSI exemption because the agreement showed the trademark remained the sole and exclusive property of the foreign licensor, while the appellant received only a limited, non-exclusive and non-transferable licence in India. On that basis, the Tribunal found no strong prima facie case for complete waiver of pre-deposit in respect of the duty demand. It nevertheless adopted a lenient interim approach and granted only partial relief by directing a pre-deposit, rather than full waiver. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 05 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119735