Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2005 (8) TMI 522

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....lant. None, for the Respondent. [Order per : Chittaranjan Satapathy, Member (T)]. -  This is an appeal filed by the Department. Heard Shri U.H. Jadhav, learned JDR for the Department. None is present for the respondent. There is an adjournment request from the respondent, which is rejected as the miscellaneous application and the appeal can be decided without their presence. 2.&em....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....judicating Commissioner. We also do not agree with the view that there is no scope for levying of penalty of an amount less than the duty leviable. We do not agree with the Board's reasoning that the Commissioner was bound to impose penalty equal to the amount of duty confirmed in a mechanical manner irrespective of the gravity of a case. 3. Rule 96ZO(3) cited by the Board in its review or....