<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (8) TMI 522 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116992</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty of Rs. 50,000 imposed by the adjudicating Commissioner, rejecting the Department&#039;s appeal for an increase to Rs. 30,62,219. The decision emphasized the importance of considering individual circumstances in penalty determination, criticizing the Board&#039;s directive for mandatory penalties equal to duty amounts as leading to unnecessary litigation and advocating for a case-by-case assessment approach.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2012 14:05:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=153990" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (8) TMI 522 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116992</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty of Rs. 50,000 imposed by the adjudicating Commissioner, rejecting the Department&#039;s appeal for an increase to Rs. 30,62,219. The decision emphasized the importance of considering individual circumstances in penalty determination, criticizing the Board&#039;s directive for mandatory penalties equal to duty amounts as leading to unnecessary litigation and advocating for a case-by-case assessment approach.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116992</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>