Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2006 (1) TMI 303

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ppellant. Shri K.S. Bhatt, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : S.L. Peeran, Member (J) (Oral)]. -  The ROM states that there is an apparent error in the order. The learned Consultant points out from the OIO and the Show Cause Notice that the demands were raised under Rule 9(2) of the CE Rules read with proviso to Section 11A of the CE Act and that two elements have not been added i....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he case. 2. The learned Consultant submits that there must have been a mix up in the typing of the order by the Stenographer. Otherwise, such an order would not have been issued other than what was argued before the court. 3. Heard learned SDR. 4. On a careful perusal, we notice that the Show Cause Notice was issued raising demands under Rule 9(2) and for contraventions of ....