Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2006 (1) TMI 302

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... None, for the Respondent. [Order per : S.L. Peeran, Member (J)]. - This is a Revenue Appeal against Order-in-Appeal No. 21/03 (H-I)-C.E., dated 24-2-2003 passed by Commissioner (A), Hyderabad. The Commissioner (A) after due consideration and on the basis of the evidences produced by the assessee has uphold the appellant's contention that the product protyne is intended for prophylactic....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ct license issued by the Drugs Authorities. He has clearly noted that the item is intended for prophylactic use and is considered as P & P Medicaments by the Drugs Authorities. The finding is also supported by this Bench's judgment rendered in the case of Natco Pharma Ltd. v. CCE, Hyderabad reported in 2005 (185) E.L.T. 331 (T) which has uphold the classification of vitamin-B Complex injection wit....