Just a moment...

⚠✕
❮ Top
☎ Help
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Keyword Search :
AI Tools : New
Ask tax questions in natural language. Powered by AI trained on the TaxTMI legal database. Use AI Tools ➞
Call Us / Help / Feedback✕

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS
PrevPreviousNextNext

2005 (7) TMI 472

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Appellant. Shri Ganesh Harnur, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : S.L. Peeran, Member (J) (Oral)]. -  The appellants are aggrieved with the Order-in-Appeal No. 94/2005-C.E., dated 29-3-2005 upholding the recovery of duty amount of Rs. 4,21,658/- and penalty of Rs. 1,50,000/- on the ground that 0.01% of 'Dharmada' charges is required to be added in the assessable value. The learne....

PrevPreviousNextNext