<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (7) TMI 472 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116391</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted a stay on the recovery of duty and penalty amounts in a case involving the inclusion of &#039;Dharmada&#039; charges in the assessable value. The conflicting judgments of the Apex Court on whether such charges should be included led to the decision. The appeal was allowed to proceed without pre-deposit, with a final hearing scheduled for a later date to further examine the issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 10:46:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=153389" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (7) TMI 472 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116391</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted a stay on the recovery of duty and penalty amounts in a case involving the inclusion of &#039;Dharmada&#039; charges in the assessable value. The conflicting judgments of the Apex Court on whether such charges should be included led to the decision. The appeal was allowed to proceed without pre-deposit, with a final hearing scheduled for a later date to further examine the issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116391</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>