2005 (5) TMI 500

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ant. Shri K. Sanyal, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : V.K. Jain, Member (T)]. - Heard Shri B.N. Chattopadhyay, learned Consultant on the M.A. filed on 11-5-2005 for non-implementation of Tribunal's order. He submits that in pursuance of the Tribunal's order dated 21 August, 2002, the appellant has deposited Rs. 10.00 lakhs. Finally, the Tribunal decided the matter in their favour by ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

...., the Departmental authorities have not bothered to implement the order of the Tribunal. The Revenue has not obtained a stay against the order of the Tribunal. Therefore, simply mentioning that CESTAT order has not been accepted by the Departmental Authority conveyed by Supdt. [is nothing but disrespect shown to the Tribunal as well as to other judicial forums]. It is their duty to follow the dire....