<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (5) TMI 500 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116304</link>
    <description>Departmental authorities must implement a Tribunal order granting refund of a pre-deposit when no stay has been obtained. The Tribunal noted that the amount had been deposited pursuant to an earlier order and that the matter had already been decided in the appellant&#039;s favour. It held that refusal to comply merely because the departmental authority had not accepted the order was impermissible. The Commissioner was directed to ensure compliance within one month or produce a stay order from the competent authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 12:43:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=153302" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (5) TMI 500 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116304</link>
      <description>Departmental authorities must implement a Tribunal order granting refund of a pre-deposit when no stay has been obtained. The Tribunal noted that the amount had been deposited pursuant to an earlier order and that the matter had already been decided in the appellant&#039;s favour. It held that refusal to comply merely because the departmental authority had not accepted the order was impermissible. The Commissioner was directed to ensure compliance within one month or produce a stay order from the competent authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116304</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>