2005 (5) TMI 465

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....arasimhan, Advocates, for the Appellant. Shri R.C. Sankhla, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : S.S. Kang, Vice-President]. - Heard both sides. 2.The applicant filed these applications for waiver of pre-deposit of duty of Rs. 16.56 crores and penalty of the equal amount and penalties were also imposed on employees of the applicants. 3.The brief facts of the case are that the appel....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ce on the MRP on the TV sets and cleared the same. This issue is covered by the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Sony India Ltd. v. CCE, New Delhi reported in 2004 (167) E.L.T. 385. The appellant also relied upon the stay order in the case of M/s. Bigesto Foods P. Ltd. v. CCE dated 30-3-05 whereby a similar situation and following the decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the ca....