Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to waiver of pre-deposit of duty and penalty pending appeal.
Analysis: The dispute turned on whether the goods were to be treated as complete coloured television sets under Rule 2(a) of the Interpretative Rules of the Tariff and whether the benefit relating to MRP-based clearance under Notification No. 5/01 was available. The Tribunal noted that the Revenue itself was proceeding on the basis that the appellant cleared parts which were treated as complete TVs by application of the interpretative rule, while the MRP was affixed by the original equipment manufacturer. In view of the cited Supreme Court decision and the Tribunal's earlier stay order on similar facts, the appellant was found to have a strong prima facie case.
Conclusion: The pre-deposit of the entire duty and penalty was waived for hearing of the appeal.